Know your History, Or Die

/
21 mins read

By Alan Stang

Recently, I received a complaint from a now happily departed reader. He took issue with a recent piece in which I recalled the history of our centuries-long conflict with Islam. The reader said he has no interest in history. He is only interested in “now.” Specifically, he wants to hear about the Jews, nothing else. Happily, he announced that he is no longer with us, so there is no chance that these modest comments could offend his belligerent ignorance.

090720alanstangIn one of his books, Czech novelist Milan Kundera has a character explain that when the Communists impose their version of Socialism on a country, they always destroy its history. They stop teaching it in the schools. They don’t talk about it in the media. They delete and pervert it in the movies. After a while, nobody knows it. Why do the Communists do that?

They do it because if you don’t know your history, you don’t know what you are; you don’t know who you are. Personally, if you don’t know your history, you have amnesia. Nationally, if you don’t know it, you are no longer a nation. You are people milling about in a wide spot in the road. You have no cohesion. You are disunited and easily conquered.

Now look at the people Jay Leno interviews on his “Jaywalks.” Look at the recent You Tube interview of people who had just voted for Senator Also Known As. They love Sarah Palin and thought she was his running mate. They can’t identify Nancy Peelousy. They have no idea what Also Known As would do. Jay’s people don’t know whom we fought in World War II or when or who won.

Remarkably, they know they are ignorant, but their ignorance does not trouble them. On the contrary, when Jay’s questions expose it, they laugh, pleased with themselves, so they will do nothing to abate it. Their ignorance is “cool,” which, where I come from, has always meant, “not so hot.” They are potential slaves, waiting for some dictator to corral them. They will still be giggling inanely about how, like, cool it is, man, as they are put aboard the cattle cars.

Look with me at just one chapter in our history. Since millions of young, putative Americans – who stalk among us and vote – apparently know little if anything about World War II, my guess is that only a pitiful remnant has even heard of the siege of Malta in 1565, or could even find that historic island on a map.

In 1565, Islam is again threatening Europe. Muslim slavers are raiding the nations all along the Mediterranean, depopulating villages, taking white – white – white slaves. Indeed, the Muslims took white slaves as far away as Iceland. Imagine! Today you are in Reykjavik, blond, blue-eyed, enjoying the ice; a few days later you wake up with a knot on your head, the grandmother of all migraines, and you are a white slave in Morocco, eaten up with envy of the free blacks in the Congo.

More than two centuries later, the fledgling United States will fight its first war against these Muslim slavers and pirates. But now we are at Malta, it is 1565, and our host for this expedition is Michael Davies, who told the story at the 2002 Dietrich von Hildebrand Institute Symposia in New York. You could also consult The Great Siege, by Ernle Bradford (New York, Harcourt, Brace & World, 1962).

Malta, in the western Mediterranean, was Christian, like the Holy Land, which the Muslims had raped, robbed and conquered after almost seven centuries of hegemony by worshippers of Jesus. Its strategic location endangered the lucrative Muslim piracy and slavery racket. Maltese vessels were harrying Ottoman Empire piracy routes.

Suleiman the Magnificent – Vice-Regent of God on Earth, Lord of the Lords of East and West, and Possessor of Men’s Necks, et cetera and so on – ruled Islam at the time and commanded the most awesome military force in the world. He sent 200 ships, 40,000 troops plus innumerable thousands of slaves and more than 6,000 elite Janissaries, the “Invincible Ones.”

Beside them were the drug-crazed Iayalars who wore the skins of wild beasts and whose raison d’etre was to reach paradise through death by slitting Christian throats in battle. Suleiman’s vengeance would be sweet and easy. Only 9,000 Christians waited to confront him, including 5,000 Maltese irregulars and 500 galley slaves. He would roll over them like the tide in the Bosporus, crush them; drown them in the sea.

Overcome by hubris, he may have overlooked the 700 knights of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem among them. Maybe he didn’t know about their leader, Grand Master Jean Parisot de la Valette, who had survived a year as a galley slave himself, sometimes rowing twenty hours a day stark naked in the bowels of a Muslim ship. De la Valette’s people hailed from Toulouse, which means he was French. What? Yes, French!

De la Valette told his Christian warriors this: “It is the great battle of the Cross and the Koran which is now to be fought. A formidable army of infidels are on the point of invading our island. We, for our part, are the chosen soldiers of the Cross, and if Heaven requires the sacrifice of our lives, there can be no better occasion than this. Let us hasten then, my brothers, to the sacred altar. There we will renew our vows and obtain by our faith in the sacred Sacraments, that contempt for death which alone can render us invincible.”

In May 1565, the Muslims arrived and assaulted Fort St. Elmo, at the tip of what is now the Maltese capital Valletta on the north shore of Grand Harbor. The Muslims expected to take it in three days. It took thirty five. Every day the knights at St. Elmo held out gave the defenders at St. Angelo, the main base across the harbor, more time to prepare. At night, Valette sent reinforcements. Aware they were heading to certain death, they were grateful for the honor of dying there.

Word arrived that the help the Christians expected from Don Garcia de Toledo, Viceroy of nearby Sicily, would not come in time, if at all. On May 31, La Valette read this dispatch to his Council:

“We now know that we cannot look to others for our deliverance! It is only upon God and our own swords that we must rely. Yet this is no reason to be disheartened. Rather the opposite, for it is better to know the truth of one’s situation than be deceived by specious hopes. Our faith and the honor of our Order are in our own hands. We shall not fail.”

The invaders pounded the walls to dust. Then they attacked, endless waves of screaming Muslims, trampling the bodies of their slain, across the moat into which the walls of St Elmo had slid. Each time the diminishing band of defenders fought them off, with pikes and battle-axes, firing muskets and dropping blocks of stone, throwing fire-hoops and cauldrons of boiling pitch that set the flowing robes of the Muslims ablaze and burned them to death like human torches. Michael Davies comments: “The pork-like odor of burning flesh filled the air.” Burning Muslims who smelled like pork?

Knight Rafael Salvage and Captain de Miranda arrived from Sicily with Viceroy Don Garcia’s latest message to La Valette. Here is what they saw at St. Elmo: “The insupportable fatigues increasing, chiefly the whole night, and the burying in the parapets of bowels and limbs of men all torn to pieces and pounded by the hostile cannon, to such a pass had the hapless besieged been reduced; never stirring from their posts, but sleeping there and eating; with all other human functions; in arms always, and prepared for combat; . . . they had got so disfigured that they hardly knew each other any more. Ashamed of retiring for wounds not manifestly quite dangerous or almost mortal, those with the smaller bones dislocated or shattered, and livid faces bruised with frightful sores, or extremely lame and limping woefully; these miserably bandaged round the head, arms in slings, strange contortions—such figures were frequent and nearly general, and to be taken for spectres rather than living forms.”

On the 18th of June, La Valette called for volunteers to reinforce. Thirty knights along with 300 soldiers came forward, offering themselves for certain death. The original garrison of St. Elmo numbered 1,500. On Friday, June 22, 1565, a few hundred survivors remained. They sang hymns, prayed, defiantly tolled their chapel bell and prepared to meet Jesus. Those who could no longer stand were seated in chairs, fully armed. Incredibly, they managed to fight on for some hours. The Muslims had finally won the outpost but had lost precious time and thousands of their best troops.

Then the Muslim commander, Mustapha Pasha, made a fatal mistake. Raging at Christian impertinence, he decapitated the knights, raised their heads on spikes, crucified their officers to mock Jesus and floated their headless bodies across the harbor to Fort St. Angelo, where they washed up next morning. De La Valette responded with cannon.

It did little damage, but the Mohammedans were horrified when they saw what he was using for balls. They may have even recognized some of them. When his crucified knights washed up on shore, De La Valette decapitated the Muslim prisoners he was holding, threw their corpses into the sea and armed the cannon with their heads. Mustapha and his Mohammedans were enormously offended. Some of those missiles had belonged to friends.

De la Valette told his men to take no prisoners. Every day until the end of the siege they hanged one Turkish prisoner upon the walls of Medina. Aghast at the enormity of his losses to take so small a prize, Mustapha offered safe passage to the Knights if they would only surrender the island and leave. They refused.

The Grand Master told the knights this: “I will tell you now openly, my brethren, that there is no hope to be looked for except in the succor of Almighty God – the only true help. He who has looked after us until now, will not forsake us, nor will he deliver us into the hands of the enemies of the Holy Faith. We are soldiers and we shall die fighting. If, by any evil chance, the enemy should prevail, we can expect no better treatment than our brethren who were in St. Elmo. . . . Let no man think that there can be any question of receiving honorable treatment, or escaping with his life. If we are beaten, we shall all be killed. It would be better to die in battle than terribly and ignominiously at the hands of the conqueror.”

The siege continued, the target now St. Angelo, the fortified enclave of the knights on the southern side of Grand Harbor. No one anywhere has ever fought a battle more ferocious. The Mohammedans tunneled beneath the Christian defenses to bury a mine and blow the knights up. When the Muslims ignited it, on August 18th, the head of the mine was finally under the Bastion of Castile. It destroyed a vast section of the main wall. Muslim troops swarmed through the breach.

La Valette seized a pike and rushed from his post of command in Birgu towards the Bastion of Castile. About to give way, his soldiers saw the Grand Master at the head of some knights running towards the danger. They forgot their fear and stopped the invading Muslims.

A grenade injured La Valette in the leg. Men shouted, “The Grand Master is in danger!” From every side knights and soldiers came rushing to his aid. The Muslims staggered and fell back. “Withdraw, Sire, to a place of safety!” a knight shouted. “The enemy is already in retreat!” Limping, la Valette continued up the slope. “As long as their banners still wave in the wind,” he said, “I will not withdraw.”

Not until the Christians reoccupied the whole bastion and repaired the defenses did he agree to have his wound dressed. At dawn, when the Muslims finally withdrew, both fortresses were still in Christian hands. By the way, Grand Master Jean de la Valette was not only French; when he commanded Christian defenders at the siege of Malta he was seventy one years old. Are you striplings in your sixties embarrassed yet?

The siege lasted 112 days. More than 40,000 Muslims had arrived. Only some 10,000 returned to formerly Christian Constantinople. Almost 250 knights of the Order had been killed; the survivors were badly wounded or crippled for life. Of the original 9,000, barely 600 still could bear arms.

Michael Davies says this: “The Maltese were one with the Knights, determined, whatever the cost, to be rid of the Turkish invader, though of the nobles there is barely a word in contemporary records; presumably they sat it out in their palaces in Medina.” In other words, they were irrelevant. See my recent piece entitled, “Innocent Bystanders.”

All this happened in 1565, not long ago, a mere four hundred some years. Look at the map and you will see that the Christian triumph at Malta was one of the hallowed few that saved Western civilization. Another was the battle of Tours, where Mayor of the Palace Charles Martel, “the Hammer,” commanded the French knights who stopped the Muslim advance in 732.

There was the battle of Lepanto, in 1571, where the Christian fleet commanded by Don John of Austria defeated the Muslims. Miguel de Cervantes, wounded in that battle, would go home to write one of the greatest books of all time. And the next time you explain how many Polaks you need to screw in a light bulb, remember that without the Poles you would now be speaking Arabic. The Polish hussars commanded by King John Sobieski saved the West in 1683, when they stopped the advancing Muslims at the gates of Vienna.

Are you a Christian? Are you a man of the West? All of this is your history. Without it, you are what the conspiracy for world government wants. You are a Jay Leno interviewee, a giggling ignoramus, reveling in your ignorance, a parasite ripe for extortion and conquest, brainwashed to be exactly that in the nation’s communist government schools. You don’t know who and what you are; so you are nothing.

What are you in possession of your history? I chose one example to narrate. As you read it did you not feel something elemental struggle to erupt? Did you not feel the feminism and political correctness and multiculturalism and affirmative action, the “religion of peace,” pansy preachers and make nice slough off? Notice that in the siege of Malta the knights saw no need to let bull dykes play games. Does your history not overwhelm all of that with righteous, masculine, inexhaustible Christian power?

The couple of years to come will require Christian warriors like Jean Parisot de la Valette and his knights. You are very fortunate because you just happen to be here right now. You have the chance to fight and maybe even to die in the same cause. History will make you the envy of Christendom.

Men of the West! Stand and fight!

© 2009 – Alan Stang – All Rights Reserved

 

25 Comments

  1. I have lost count of how many times I have had to explain to idiot Dawkinsists What REALLY happened during the crusades, their real reason, and how and why they failed. As well as the real reasons behind the Spanish inquisition and how IT failed in the long run.
    Ignorance is bliss. Right up until it turns into hell on earth.

  2. Well, the dumbed down explanation (since Atheists respond far more strongly to rhetoric than to well-written articles like yours detailing the historical points) Is that the crusades were nothing more than a series of punitive raids to punish and prevent muslims from raiding and slaving in christian countries.
    Obviously they were cloaked in religion, but the real reasons were both logical and fiscal. Islamics were well-known for slavetaking across the borders of Turkey, and at times they nearly decimated the populations of countries like Spain. Islamic fundamentalism not only excuses raiding, conquest, and slaveing, but actually rewards it, which is why the behavior even persists to this day.
    In the eleventh century, the muslims were serious about taking christian countries. Egypt, Palestine, and Syria were previously part of the ‘christian realm’ before being utterly conquered by muslim hordes, and soon were followed by most of Spain and northern Africa, and the Byzantines were pushed back all the way to greece, destroying a thousand years of history in the process. In essense, they captured and destroyed nearly two thirds of Christendom.
    After Pope… umm… Urban II? called up the warriors for the crusades, huge numbers of men responded. Before about 30 years ago, it was often thought that this was more or less a mercenary army, but recent research strongly suggests that these were not mercenaries… They were genuinely pious men of means, knights and barons of the realms that called up their levies and knights to join in battle with the infidel. This dispels the first Dawkins myth that the crusades were about ‘money’
    The Crusades were a response to this invasion, a truly defensive set of wars, with the goal of taking back christian lands and brutally punishing the invaders that had stolen them. While the basic concept was successful, Urban’s first goal was to ‘free christians from the Yoke of Islam’, which was somewhat successful, and it was seen as an act of love, rescuing christian brothers, sisters, and neighbors from the horrors of slavery.
    Also the goal was to liberate Jerusalem, it being central to the life of Christ. There was neither greed nor colonialism involved in the reconquest. There was no ‘christain conversion’, muslims were the ENEMY to be defeated, not the misinformed to be converted.
    Obviously there were a few that used the crusades as an excuse to rob and plunder their way through ‘extraneous’ areas, like the German Crossmen that took up residence in Poland and became warlords, especially after their excommunication, and people like Count Emichio… but the Jews too, were at War with Christendom, so raiding them was considered reasonably forgiveable if not covered under the Auspices of the church.
    The very first Crusade was temporarily successful, almost miraculously so, but soon the lands gained and people freed fell again to the Turks. Succeeding crusades were vastly less successful, as evidenced by the huge number of formerly christian countries still under the control of Islamocracy. The reason for failure is that during the middle ages, european nations were regularly falling to the plague and were simultaneously desperately attempting to survive the onslaught from the north, the mongol hordes during the ‘human migration’ period. Between the greasy yellow bastards and the greasy brown goathumpers, Christianity was a tiny light of civilization in constant threat of being snuffed out, let alone capable of defending newly-recovered lands and oppressed peoples.
    The History of the crusades is less an exploration of the ‘evils of christianity’ and more an explanation of why Islam must be stamped out at all costs.
    But I figure you already know all this.

  3. I figure it’s better to know a reasonably close to accurate ‘dumbed down’ version of history than to fail to understand an entirely accurate and dry rendition.

  4. Brigadon,
    There is also a very good book entitled “Mohammed v Charlemagne: A Controversy Revisited”, which deals with the Henri Pirenne theory of the very early 20th Century. Pirenne’s theory challenged the conventional wisdom about the golden age of Islam. Well worth reading.

    • I actually read much of it from Tyerman’s “Fighting for Christendom: Holy War and the Crusades”. But I shall certainly look at Pirenne’s theory.
      Essentially Christian history has been a history of always being the underdog… One of the reasons why an underdog is so unthinkingly beloved in western culture, often to it’s detriment. Especially when a clever politician or wordsmith can convince people that an overarching tyranny is ‘made up of underdogs’.

      • Pirenne did take a totally new look at the Christian v. Islam question. I once read his work for a graduate level History course (I do not have a degree in History – it was just for fun). So his work does get attention in academia, for what that is worth.

  5. Such a riveting account that I will share with family and friends.
    I have to confess that I’ve come late to the History party since I was very much a non-attentive student in school. History class was something to be tolerated and not celebrated. However, the history we studied was mostly American history; Very little in the way of world history.
    Articles and commentary such as this inspires me to learn more.

  6. I’m so happy to have found this site. Already checking Amazon for Mohammad vs. Charlamagne. So far I have been reading a lot of Robert Price’s work but I would like to do some deeper reading.
    Oh and thank you for building this site!
    E

  7. Correction: I am reading ROBERT SPENCER not Robert Price (they both have great beards – easy to confuse them).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

What Is Wrong With America?

Next Story

Springfield Armory Saint

Latest from Culture

The Unpersoning

A modern phenomena this crowd will be familiar with is Cancel Culture. This is when a

Two-Level Lies

The Left tells lies that have two levels. One level is the lie their side is

Obey God, Not Man

Editor’s Note: Longtime reader, Darrel Sipes, shares this with us. Originally written for a friend, he