Trump 2024 – Melania

///
1 min read

I am going to just face the big issue head on, as it is true of Melania, just as it is true of Ivana (DJT’s first wife). Both of them are foreign-born, and we know the Constitution says that the President must be a natural-born citizen, meaning they cannot be naturalized citizens. Yes, Melania (and Ivana) are naturalized.

Look….we already had a Kenyan for President, so I see no problem having a Czech or Slovene stepping into that role. This is a non-issue, and the Dems are the ones who made it so.

So, let’s look at the reasons we should elect Melania Trump as president in 2024. I have two reasons.

First, she is very intelligent and accomplished. She not only grew up in a Communist system, so knows how crappy such a system is, but along the way, she learned to speak 5 languages fluently – on top of her native Slovenian. She is a successful businesswoman in her own right, having created a jewelry line and cosmetics line that have done quite well. That is all after a very successful modelling career.

Second,

Lead Scheduler at MOTW. Husband, Father, but most importantly, a man of God. Possesses more degrees that most people find useful.

7 Comments

  1. I’m gonna go with an ‘absolutely not’ one this score. She was a model, which means in all likely hood that she is ditzy, having gotten by on merely existing. Lots of women get into jewelry and perfume lines once finished with ‘careers’ in the ‘body’ business; how many men did she hire to actually run things?She leveraged that to marry rich, another bad sign, and married a man who was largely a frivolous playboy type, which tells us all we need to know about her. She may be a nice lady, but I doubt she is ruling material, as her husband barely is. Lastly, how many more “empowered” women do we need.

    Sincerest apologies for ripping this post, interesting blog in general.

  2. As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

  3. Well if she ran at least we would have leftard outlets constantly posting and reposting those n00dz of her. Maybe some new ones, too.

  4. “This is a non-issue, and the Dems are the ones who made it so.”
    G. K. Chesterton might have a bone to pick with Theo:
    “Now this is the attitude which I attack. It is the huge heresy of Precedent. It is the view that because we have got into a mess we must grow messier to suit it; that because we have taken a wrong turn some time ago we must go forward and not backwards; that because we have lost our way we must lose our map also; and because we have missed our ideal we must forget it.”
    “What’s Wrong with the World”, part 3, chapter 12

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Hatred of Boundaries and the Death of Meaning

Next Story

Hymn: Lord, In This Thy Mercy’s Day

Latest from Culture

Hegelian Dialectic

The Hegelian dialectic is one of the more insidious tools the enemy uses to pervert and

Why Beauty Matters

Because Google and BBC is asshole, I can only find this documentray from Roger Scruton on