Why the British Colonized North America

December 26, 2016
2 mins read

Considering the North American continent to be savage and uncivilized, and in need of British influence, British apologists called on their fellow Englishmen to redeem the land, as directed by God’s Providence (James, p. 12). Not only where the native inhabitants of North America savage, but they failed to utilize the natural resources of the land. This caused many English to declare that the natives had forfeited their right to the land, opening the door for colonization. These same arguments would later be made in other regions, including Asia, Africa, and Australia.
In order for this movement to succeed, the immigrants had to understand and agree that the Native Americans had no real claim on the land. Early reports from missionaries and explorers lent credence to that understanding. Native Americans, West Indians, and even black slaves imported by Europeans, with very different social customs and traditions than the Europeans, were viewed as cannibals, brutes, and a source of revulsion (James, p. 13, 20-22). As revolting as they were to the British, they were also viewed as easy prey, not really standing in the way of European “progress.” This is another sort of propaganda, which might cause a wavering immigrant to think the task of populating and controlling a wild continent might be easy.
britsamericaAnother perspective on this situation was provided by religious authorities, who saw the Native Americans as a prime target for evangelization. Viewed as idolaters, missionaries began to make contact, hoping to convert the heathens to Christianity, as well as improving their status as uncivilized. It was thought that by converting and educating the natives, both the British and the natives would be improved. Not only would this provide for the growth of British civilization, but a new ally would be engendered (James, p. 13-14). This would appeal to kind-hearted and religious zealots, prompting some of them to consider immigration. Ultimately, this plan did not work, and the settlers turned to exterminating the natives, which would attract a different sort of immigrant.
“England joined Christian liberty with political liberty in a powerful apocalyptic vision that projected universal reform” (Williamson, p. 235). In this sense, England considered itself a bulwark of Protestant righteousness, opposed to satanic Roman Catholicism, as manifested in the Spanish Empire (ibid., p. 236). This religious impetus was behind much of the propaganda advocating colonization, both of the American Continent and the West Indies (James, p. 16).
In the east, while the Dutch had made inroads into India, British interests soon came to proliferate. In order to establish economic dominance, Britain was forced to keep an “impressive public face” (James, p. 26). These Indians were viewed as harmless, though still not taking advantage of the natural resources of their country.
The goal of settlers may well have been the promise of wealth and power, but the underlying principles behind the colonization dealt with the desire to spread British civilization, the education and enlightenment of a backward people, and primarily the desire to fulfill a perceived religious mandate to spread the truth of Protestantism, curtailing the influence of Catholicism.
Works Cited:
James, Lawrence. The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. New York, St. Martin’s Griffin, 1994.
Williamson, Arthur H. “An Empire to End Empire: The Dynamic of Early Modern British Expansion.” Huntington Library Quarterly, Vol. 68, No. 1-2 (March 2005), (pp. 227-256).

Lead Scheduler at MOTW. Husband, Father, but most importantly, a man of God. Possesses more degrees that most people find useful.


  1. Scholarly. I don’t mean to pick nits but there were more basic forces at work too, beyond the rationalisations.
    England and Europe’s population was growing rapidly in the 17th century and booming by the 18th. With the religious wars of the 1700’s guttering out, European powers were in an expansive mood.
    And yet, for the lower orders (i.e. 80% of the population), the class and economic structure of the time promised very little hope for advancement at home. Going abroad to find your fortune – or taking it from the cold, dead hands of some savage you just gave a face full of musketry – that was the ticket.
    Explains why folks would sell everything they owned to go on a horrible, dysentry-wracked journey to a savage wilderness on the other side of the planet.
    And let’s not forget Flashy’s observation:
    “Now, see here you mealy little pimp!
    “I’ve had just about a bellyful of your pious hypocritical maundering… If you think [the whites] were a whit more guilty than your darling redskins, you’re an even bigger bloody fool than you look. What bleating breast-beaters like you can’t comprehend… is that when selfish, frightened men — in other words, any men, red or white, civilised or savage — come face to face in the middle of a wilderness that both of ’em want… then war breaks out, and the weaker goes under. Policies don’t matter a spent piss — it’s the men in fear and rage and uncertainty watching the woods and skyline, d’you see, you purblind bookworm, you!”

    • Yes, this is a basic and fragmentary look. It is not intended to be exhaustive, of course. Just a little peek into the world of the early colonists. I appreciate your insight, as well. I especially think you are dead on with the fact that it gave the opportunity to rise above the poor folks’ status in the old world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Support Men Of The West

Previous Story

Reader Response/Requests

Next Story

Analysis of "For the Soul of Mankind"

Latest from Culture

10 Westerns You Should See

Westerns. I love Western movies. Hold on to your 10-gallon hats, because I’m doing a speedrun through 10 reviews. “Once Upon A Time In The West” Great show, skirts right to the
Go toTop